Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Massacre (video game) (3rd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muslim Massacre (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While there is a lot of content and sourcing, all the sourcing present is limited to a specific time frame, failing to demonstrate sustained notability. Research into discussion on the subject down the road has turned up largely empty. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 08:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. While most sources are from September 2008, when the game as initially released, later sources are easily found 1 2 3 including books and a peer-reviewed scientific paper. The article already has a later source, a book named Halos and Avatars, as well. Cortador (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. The article's current sourcing is more than enough to prove notability. Sustained coverage is not required per WP:NVG (similar to guidelines such as WP:NBOOK), and WP:SUSTAINED does not say that sustained coverage is required for notability - only that it is an indicator of notability. This is a case of WP:NOTTEMPORARY. (Or not, as the sources found by Cortador show.) Astaire (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per above. SUSTAINED is for events (and basically people because of BLP1E) not media. Otherwise 95% of the media we have articles on wouldn't be notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Sources provided and in the article are sufficient to keep. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as above - little to add beyond the well-written outline of Astaire on how WP:SUSTAINED works. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)